Facts and figures behind the tech giants' code confrontation

Comment Email Print

With the end of the consultation period on Australia's News Media Bargaining Code tomorrow begins a confrontation with technology giants Google and Facebook.

The regulation would force these multinational corporations to negotiate payment for the inclusion of Australian journalism content in Google Search and Facebook News Feed.

IBISWorld senior industry analyst Jason Aravanis says that while the costs associated would have only a minor impact on their profitability, the precedent it sets could be more important.

There are reports Google might withdraw from Australia altogether rather than risk this precedent, which remove access to common technology services including Google Search, Google Maps and YouTube.

"This profound response to Australia's proposed new code has precedent. In 2014, Google completely shut down its Google News service in Spain, after being subject to licensing regulations in that country," says Aravanis.

Google escalated its confrontation with the federal government this week with warnings on its Google Search results and other products.

There are also reports federal MPs and senators have been targeted by an email campaign opposing the code, linked to an anonymous YouTube user who started a Change.org petition. Some 40,000 people who signed the petition have been urged to keep emailing MPs until the proposed law is shelved. The person has denied that YouTube parent Google is behind the email campaign.

The draft News Media Bargaining Code was released in July, following an ACCC investigation into the market power of Google and Facebook. IBISWorld says revenue in the Newspaper Publishing industry has declined from $5.9 billion in 2009-10, to $2.7 billion in 2019-20, representing an annualised decline of 7.5 per cent each year. Employment in the industry has also fallen by 55.6 per cent over this period, particularly due to the closure of small-scale and regional publications.

Aravanis attributes the loss to two primary factors - the falling value of print advertisements amid the transition to online media consumption, and that of news medias' digital advertisements. "Media organisations have been forced to offer digital advertisement services at a low price point to remain viable against alternative providers, including Google through ads placed in search results and Facebook through ads embedded in user newsfeeds," he says.

But he points to a "multi-faceted" relationship between Google, Facebook and Australian media organisations. "In addition to being competitors in the online advertising industry, both companies are also essential business partners.

"Both Google and Facebook rely heavily on the inclusion of journalism content in their platforms in order to drive consumer traffic. According to the ACCC, between eight per cent and 14 per cent of Google Search results trigger a 'Top Stories' result, which typically includes content from news media websites.

"A 2019 study from the University of Canberra found a third of Australian consumers accessed news through social media, and a quarter accessed news through search engines.

"It is clear that both digital platforms derive value from the inclusion of media content. However, media providers have little ability to make digital platforms pay for access to this content."


Aravanis says news media businesses risk losing a significant source of revenue if they prevent Google from providing links to its websites in search results. "In Germany, Google negotiated individual licensing agreements with media publishers. Media organisations that failed to secure an agreement saw a significant decrease in traffic to their websites once their results were removed from Google Search results. Due to this outcome, many German media organisations agreed to let Google access their content for free.

"This imbalance in negotiating power has led the Federal Government to introduce a negotiate-arbitrate framework through the News Media Bargaining Code."

Google and Facebook have argued that news media organisations already receive fair compensation for their content, through the direction of consumers to news websites via results in Google Search and the Facebook News Feed. Facebook has said it sent 2.3 billion clicks to Australian news publishers in the five months from January to May 2020, which they estimated to be worth $195.8 million to the news organisations.

The regulatory model proposed by the ACCC to force Google and Facebook to agree to terms with Australian media organisations is similar to the one used to break up Telstra's former monopoly on the telecommunications services industry prior to 2005-06, when it owned the country's entire copper phone network.

"Under this model, if the two parties are unable to reach an agreement the process will automatically move to a binding final offer stage. Each party will propose an agreement, and an independent arbitrator will pick one agreement. Final offer rules are designed to avoid easily ruled out claims, and force the parties to converge or risk the opposing party's position being accepted by the arbitrator," he said.

If a satisfactory resolution cannot be found, Google has indicated a willingness to 'go dark' on its popular and ubiquitous services, in order to dissuade other nations from following Australia's regulatory example. Google Australia generated $4.8 billion in revenue in 2019, up from $4.2 billion in 2018. This result represents close to 2% of the global revenue of Alphabet Inc, Google's parent company. How Google's withdrawal from Australia would work in practice is unclear, but it would certainly threaten a range of industries that rely on Google's services. According to Alphabet Inc, the services provided by the search engine supported 116,200 Australian jobs in 2019, including 79,200 jobs for small and medium enterprises.

Facebook has argued that if no news content was available on Facebook in Australia, the impact on Facebook's community metrics and revenue in Australia would not be significant. It is unclear what Facebook's response would be if the regulatory code was legislated in its current form.

The confrontation between the technology giants and the Federal Government is expected to come to a critical point in the near future. The consultation period on the News Media Bargaining Code is set to expire at the end of this week. "Following that, both consumers and businesses will have to watch and wait to see how this issue is settled," says Aravanis. "The ramifications for the internet and the Australian businesses that rely upon Facebook and Google are uncertain."

IBISWorld is the publisher of a number of company reports on industry segments, including Newspaper Publishing industry in Australia; Online Advertising industry in Australia; Telecommunications Services industry in Australia; and Advertising Agencies in Australia.

Read more from:
Comment Email Print
Powered by Bondware
News Publishing Software

The browser you are using is outdated!

You may not be getting all you can out of your browsing experience
and may be open to security risks!

Consider upgrading to the latest version of your browser or choose on below: